[**The following piece was guest-written by former ConsciousAwarenessForAll partner SCOOB ADLER and formatted by myself, MERIT FREEMAN**]
It has been over 13 years since “terrorists” attacked the U.S. on 9/11. /Those who supposedly “hate our liberties, freedom and the way of life.” On the morning of Tuesday, September 11th, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-223 aircraft, took off at 8:42 am EST from Washington Dulles International Airport on its way to Los Angeles International Airport. At 9:37:46 am EST, Flight 77, traveling at 530 mph, reportedly crashed into the Pentagon. Flight 77 somehow supposedly managed to get through the most heavily defended and protected airspace in the world and crash into the U.S.’ military headquarters.
Let’s examine and take a good, hard look at what happened on that frightful morning.
You can download the official report here: http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf
According to CNN news anchors, “the American Airlines jet landed short of the Pentagon.” CNN’s correspondent BOB FRANKEN, who was at the Pentagon, stated: “from my close up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon … the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand …there are no large tail sections, wing sections a fuselage … which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.”
According to Professor FETZER, Franken was reprimanded for his live comments. Later on air he again stated: “Only a fool would deny that a plane hit the Pentagon.”
Now, let’s see what APRIL GALLUP had to say, because she was actually inside the Pentagon when it happened. The moment that American Flight 77 was said to have crashed into the Pentagon, Gallop thought that she had triggered a bomb as soon as she turned on her computer. After the initial explosion, her son was completely blown out of his stroller. She got up enough strength to go and find her son, which she could not locate. There was an area with a pack of debris, so she and others climbed over it, but before doing so, she was able to locate her son. She grabbed her son proceeded to climb out with her son over her shoulders and got out of that particular location which had collapsed. Gallup came out of where the initial impact took place and came out on the lawn closest to the highway.
Gallup stated: “I hadn’t seen any evidence of metal, airplane seats, no luggage, nothing that would give me indication that it was a plane that hit the building. I didn’t have any jet fuel over my body.” Not her, her son or anyone else had jet fuel on their body. “There was nothing in the inside that would give me any indication that there was a plane on that particular day that hit the building.”
Due to the fact that what she had gone through, many thought that her judgment might have been impaired; but she asked others in the area and it was conclusive, saying: “No one else in that area where I was located saw any parts of any planes, luggage, baggage or anything of that nature…”
What do you see in the picture below? It looks like the firefighters are putting out a fire at the Pentagon with a very pristine looking lawn. Do you see any evidence of an airplane crash? We later saw debris that was supposedly from American Flight 77.
As you can see in the above image, there is no debris and firefighters, who just happened to be in the area right when the Pentagon got attacked, had almost extinguished the fire.
Here is a short clip from the documentary “Zero,” discussing the lack of debris:
There were reports of billows of smoke coming from the Pentagon, which was almost extinguished. But low and behold, the smoke was coming from dumpsters in front of the Pentagon, as discovered by Professor Fetzer in the Midwest 9/11 Conference: Part 2. Please watch, starting at the 31-minute mark, where he begins to discuss the Pentagon on 9/11:
Fake smoke machines at the Pentagon on 9/11: http://letsrollforums.com/fake-smoke-machines-pentagon-t23757.html?s=9a245abb8ba290dbb6eccae4bd5bc77f&
Professor Fetzer stated that a C-130H (Hercules), which he discusses at the MidWest 9/11 Truth Conference: Part 2, was seen circling the Pentagon and must have dropped the debris. A&E interviewed Lt. Col. O’BRIEN of the Minnesota Air National Guard’s 133rd who piloted the C-130H (Hercules). On the morning of September 11th, he took off from Andrew’s Air Force Base. He stated that the accusation was absurd. Professor Fetzer asked: “Where else could it of come from?”
Here is the footage of a C-130, which was flying around the Pentagon about 2 minutes after the explosion:
A still from the video above:
A still from the above video:
BRUCE LOONEY took the following photograph from Ft. McNair:
I wonder what these two guys are up to? It appears as if they are assisting with the spreading of debris over the Pentagon lawn.
The image below was taken right after the initial impact at the Pentagon:
The collapse of the side of the Pentagon wall occurred about 45 minutes after impact. There were no broken windows adjacent to this hole and no evidence of any wing marks on the building where a 757 measures 126″ 10’ from wing to wing supposedly impacted. Nor were there any indications in the upper floors where the tail, which stood 44″ 6′ from the ground would have made an impact. And what happened to Flight 77’s 6 ton, 12′ x 9′ engines that were made of titanium? There was no evidence on the walls where the engines, the heaviest and strongest part of the plane, should have impacted. Criminal elements and government stooges suggest that the engines vaporized. Yeah right. Titanium doesn’t even melt unless it reaches 1668° C or 3,034° F.
The only engine part located in the wreckage is the one pictured below. It was, at one point, claimed to be a Honeywell rotor from the rear “APU” engine in a Boeing 757’s tail-section. The high-resolution photos of the “rotor” in question were scrutinized and studied. Honeywell later stated: “there is no way that is any part of an APU engine we manufacture.”
KARL SCHWARTZ, former GOP Strategist and Patmoz Nanotechnologies Inc. security systems CEO, recognized the part as a JT8D Turbo from the US Air Force A-3 Skywarrior, saying: “The only piece of wreckage that appears ‘genuine’ in the FEMA photo is the front shaft bearing housing from the US Air Force A-3 Skywarrior or something very similar.”
Only 4 or 5 still existed on 9/11 and they were stored at Hughes Aircraft in Van Nuys, CA, now better known as RAYTHEON, a big war profiteer.
The air traffic controllers at Dulles thought that the blip on their radar was a military jet.
HANI HANJOUR was supposedly the hijacker that piloted American Flight 77 into the Pentagon. He had difficulty controlling and landing a single engine Cessna 172 in August after 3 test runs. Please see the 9/11 documentary “Loose Change,” starting from the 13:45 second mark.
The JASON INGERSOLL photo collection: http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic7.htm
Why does it say “Punch Out”? According to Professor Fetzer: “The Pentagon walls are about 10 to 12 feet thick, which are 6 feet thick of brick, 3 feet of concrete and 3 feet of limestone.” So a Boeing 757, made of an aluminum alloy, was able to manage somehow to go through 3 rings E, D and C? You’re kidding, right? And according to Professor Fetzer, it appears to have been punched out with chlorate military explosives in order to give a false impression that part of the plane went all the way through this hole. Professor Fetzer also mentions that if part of the plane had gone through at an angle, it would have created an asymmetrical hole.
The image below shows where American Flight 77 supposedly came through to its final resting place in the Pentagon’s C ring:
In January of 2004, the ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) released its Pentagon Building Performance Report and a video computer analysis as to what supposedly happened when American Flight 77 allegedly hit the Pentagon.
What’s significant about this report is that the 18.5-inch steel-reinforced concrete walls were omitted and overlooked. Secondly, the tail section was intact as it supposedly entered the Pentagon and left no entry point. Thirdly, they didn’t use any engines in the simulation. Lastly, they claimed to have taken out 50 support columns? The official report states that the support columns were taken out, but the photographic evidence shows otherwise.
There was no fire damage, computers were intact and the desks were intact.
The official report said Flight 77 took out all these wall structures and support beams, but photo and video evidence speaks for itself and shows the north (left) side was completely intact.
This piece of debris, as you see down below, comes from a Boeing 757, but not American Flight 77. The debris appears as if it was peeled off, with no signs of it being exposed to intense heat or a violent crash.
There was a piece of vine present which was not indigenous to the Arlington, Virginia vicinity. It was attached to the corner of this piece of debris. Newspaper reporter JAMES ( JIM) HANSON, who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan’s College of Law, was able to trace the piece of debris to a rain forest above Cali, Columbia where a crash occurred in 1995, as discussed in the MidWest 9/11 Conference: Part 2.
JIM HANSON’S DE-VINE REVELATION:
GLEN STANISH is the founder of 9/11 Truth. He spent 20 years as a professional airline pilot. He has also studied aviation incidents and accidents and stated in “9/11: Ripple Effect” that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, because there would have been an abundance of wreckage: large tail sections, indestructible landing gear, indestructible engines, wing spars, fuselages, seats, etc.
You can hear the Glen Stanish interview here:
A group called “Citizens Investigative Team” reported that there were witnesses that saw a plane fly toward the Pentagon, north of the Citgo Station. They stated that an airplane flew about 300 feet in the air and approached the Pentagon. A truck driver named DAVE BAWL saw a plane fly over the Pentagon and then swerve over it as soon as there was an explosion. What a way to help fool everyone into believing the official story that people did in fact witness a plane. Dave was found dead in an abandoned building weeks later.
According to the official story, the green line in the image below is the direction of American Flight 77.
The official story stated that American Flight 77 maintained this trajectory, flying 20 feet above the ground for 3,280 feet before hitting the Pentagon, traveling at 530 mph hour. The official report also stated that Flight 77 took out 5 lampposts before hitting the Pentagon. It did this without its wings falling off, ripping off, tumbling out of control or bursting into flames? This act not only defies the law of aerodynamics, but Newton’s third law as well.
According to Newton’s third law, a plane traveling 500 mph hitting a stationary lamppost would have the same effect as fixed plane being hit by a lamppost that was going 500 mph.
CNN (one of many propaganda machines) conducted a case study on the Pentagon. The utter nonsense that they put out saying that a Boeing 757 can survive hitting 5 light poles, let alone 1 light pole traveling at over 500 miles an hour, is ridiculous.
Watch how easily this South West Boeing 757 airplane’s wing sustains damage from the ramp, which rolled into it twice in the 35 mph winds.
“The cause of the crash — just south of Hobby Airport — was not immediately known. Television station KHOU reported that the plane had apparently clipped a light pole prior to the crash.”
FRED FOX is a former U.S. Navy and a 33-year commercial pilot for American Airlines. He stated that not even a seasoned American test pilot could have flown a T-category aircraft like the 757 into the first floor of the Pentagon because of something called “Ground Effect.” Professor Fetzer explained “Ground Effect” at the MidWest 9/11 Conference: Part 2. It is the accumulation of pockets of compressed gas beneath the fuselage, which mean that the plane could not have gotten lower than 60-80 feet above the ground while traveling at that speed.
“9/11: Ripple Effect” Documentary: Ground Effects
Listen to what Captain RUSS WITTEMBERG talks about all of this in the 9/11 documentary “Zero.” It defies the laws of physics! He has 30 years of flying experience in military and civilian aviation.
Here is a short clip from “Zero” where Wittemberg gives his views:
“I challenge any pilot, any pilot anywhere: give him a Boeing 757 and tell him to do 400 knots 20 feet above the ground for half a mile. Can’t do. It’s aerodynamically impossible.” ~ NILA SAGADEVAN (Pilot and aeronautical engineer)
Please Watch “ZERO: An Investigation Into 9-11”:
CONDOLEEZA RICE denied any ideas that airplanes would be used as weapons against the Pentagon. A year prior to 9/11, a simulation was conducted using a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon.
Speaking of simulation and drills, did you know that there were drills going on before 9/11, as well as on the day of 9/11, which caused utter confusion? Please have a listen to Representative CYNTHIA MCKINNEY drill DONALD RUMSFELD:
LLOYD A. ENGLAND is a crucial witness who allegedly had light pole #1 smash through the windshield of his taxi. He states that he pulled the pole out minutes after it struck his windshield. He states that he had help from an unknown bystander who came by to help him. You can see that there is no damage to the hood of the car. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation, the pole was 40 feet long, weighing 247 lbs. Here is the interview in which England states that his wife was an FBI employee:
Notice the C-130 flying in the background of the above image.
No damage to the hood!
Lloyde England and his taxi cab in documentary “The Eye Of The Storm”:
The group “Citizens Investigative Team” believe that the poles could have been staged. It occurred shortly after the explosion and traffic was being blocked on southbound Route 27 just before the bridge. A witness saw a man on the road trying to flag her down to get her to stop, but she refused and was forced to get off the Columbia Pike exit just north of the bridge.
According to the investigators in “Eye Of The Storm,” there were no witness reports of Pole #1 entering Edwards’ cab. There were no reports of the cab spinning out sideways with the pole sticking out over the hood as Edward stated and no witness reports seeing the pole in the taxi cab whatsoever. There are only about 20 folks who mention the pole, which was already on the road after the event.
So how were the poles staged? The area was under control by Pentagon and Arlington police. The Pentagon police control the 3 out of the 5 poles. The Virginia Department of Transportation managed the other 2 poles and would not provide information to the filmmakers of the locations of the other 2 poles. One possibility was that the renovations that week at the Pentagon were to be completed and scheduled to close down at the time of the impact/explosion.
President BUSH had left the heliport on 9/10 and was scheduled to arrive back 9/11 at noon, as confirmed by Heliport control SEAN BOGER, which means that the Secret Service could control the area without people asking why. They received confirmation from a Pentagon renovation contractor that they were moving around trailers on 9/10.
The Pentagon had 86 separate cameras. Why didn’t they show us the video footage from all the different angles if it was a plane that hit the Pentagon? The FBI confiscated all of the video footage, but in 2006, were forced to yield, due to the Freedom of Information Act, releasing four angles of footage.
The 86 cameras at the Pentagon:
This snapshots below comes from the Pentagon Building Performance Report:
“You can determine what is a solid object, and what is not. You clearly see a line of dense (but not solid) white exhaust, trailing a solid narrow lineal object.”
Photo analyst JACK WHITE was asked to scale an image of a Boeing 757 into the frame.
Due to a lawsuit that was filed and won in a court of law, this video footage was from the morning of September 11th, 2001. The Pentagon released it in 2002. According to a hotel manager, the FBI confiscated his footage. A news anchor even states: “It shows the explosion that followed the crash of American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon, but the video does not show the airplane.”
“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.” ~ LON RAINS (Editor for “Space News” and Pentagon eyewitness)
In 2001, Donald Rumsfeld told “Parade Magazine” about the missile damage, which can be found right here:
Check out the third paragraph: “and the missile to damage this building.” He admitted that the Pentagon wasn’t hit by a plane, but by a missile.
Leaked video of missile hitting the Pentagon:
Slip of the tongue by former 9/11 Commissioner TIM ROEMER, who says a that missile hit the Pentagon, but quickly recovers and says plane:
Retired Army Major General ALBERT STUBBLEBINE states that no plane hit the Pentagon. In his last assignment, he was head of all the U.S. Army’s Strategic Intelligence Forces around the world. He was responsible for the signal’s intelligence, photo intelligence, counterintelligence and human intelligence. He concluded that Flight 77 didn’t crash into the Pentagon, but something did. He found no evidence of wing marks on the Pentagon.
Senior Editor GORDON DUFF of “Veterans Today” broke the news on 9-22-14 with STEW WEBB, Jim Fetzer and PRESTON JAMES. Gordon Duff stated that “Project Able Danger” started after the IEAE put out a report stating that the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City was done with a micro nuke. That’s what did the damage and they proved it! This project was started to investigate the missing nuclear weapons stolen from the Pentax nuclear facility in Texas which went to Israel! They used the stolen U.S. micro nukes at 9/11, OKC, Bali, Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the Bali bombing and others.
Please listen the Veterans Today Show (9-22-2014) at the 40:30 second mark
Did you know that 9 out of the 19 alleged hijackers on 9/11 were found alive?
“The other two men accused of being terrorists are SALEM AL-HAMZI and AHMED AL-NAMI. Mr. Al-Hamzi is 26 and had just returned to work at a petrochemical complex in the industrial eastern city of Yanbou after a holiday in Saudi Arabia when the hijackers struck. He was accused of hijacking the American Airlines Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.”
“Last night, the FBI admitted that there was some doubt about the identities of some of the suspects. A spokesman said: ‘The identification process has been complicated by the fact that many Arabic family names are similar. It is also possible that the hijackers used false identities.’”
“The spokesman declined to say whether the FBI would apologize, but added: ‘If we have made mistakes, then obviously that would be regrettable, but this is a big and complicated investigation.’”
“We have several hijackers whose identities were those of the names on the manifests,” said Mueller, adding: “We have several others that are still in question. The investigation is ongoing and I am not certain as to several of the others.”
“Officials refused to say how many hijackers may have used false identities, but officials of the Saudi Arabian government said Thursday that 6 of the men that the United States has named as hijackers killed in the attacks appear to be living in the Middle East.”
I have now heard many Americans state that the U.S. wouldn’t lie to the American people. Really? What about the use of torture that our government kept lying to us about?
In February of 2003, the BBC released this story: “U.S. officials have denied allegations of torture after human rights groups called for ‘urgent intervention’ to protect terror suspects detained at an American military base.”
“FEINSTEIN went on to drop the biggest bombshell yet, stating: ‘The CIA spent $40 MILLION to prevent us from issuing this report.’ That is fact. We did not spend the money, we used our staff to do this report.”
She then accused the CIA of foul play, explaining: “They went into our computers, literally, to take out information, not once, not twice, but three times. I believe that this is a separation of powers violation.”
“The damning report into CIA torture has led Poland to finally admit that it DID host a secret American prison, after years of denying it. It’s the first acknowledgement by a foreign country to hosting such a site.”
As you may be well aware of, 9/11 was referred to as the “New Pear Harbor.” “In September 2000, the PNAC published a controversial 90-page report entitled ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century.‘” Some people have compared it to HITLER’s “Mein Kampf,” which was ignored until after the war was over.
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”
Do you see the correlation? Did you know that Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen? Yes, you heard that correctly. The U.S. Navy cracked the Japanese code weeks before. Americans before Pearl Harbor had no interest getting involved in the war, so the bankers needed a catalyst; Pearl Harbor.
JAMES PERLOFF‘s “Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt’s 9/11” can be found here:
Perloff was a guest on Dr. KEVIN BARRETT’s “No Lies Radio” broadcast, which was excellent and very informative:
DOUGLAS DIETRICK is an internationally-recognized renegade military historian, global crisis analyst and former U.S. Marine. He appeared on “Coast-To-Coast A.M.” with GEORGE NOOREY on December 7th, 2012. He discussed the truth about what occurred during Pearl Harbor.
Douglas Dietrick’s official website: http://www.douglasdietrich.com/bio.html
September 11: The New Pearl Harbor:
Barrett and Professor Fetzer have their weekly “False Flag News” where they report the news that mainstream media (MSM) does not and goes into detail where MSM doesn’t. They cover the CIA torture; what the report covers and what it left out. They talk about the upcoming new “9/11,” stating that this time it will be an overt display of a nuke going of in. Watch this video to find out which city:
The U.S. government wrote a series of proposals against the Cuban government back in 1962, which originated from the Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff. The document were declassified on November 18th, 1997.
“The Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government,” writes BAMFORD.
The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut JOHN GLENN during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba.
Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, “the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists et all Cuba.”
Cognitive dissonance is used to describe the feelings of discomfort that result from holding two conflicting beliefs. When there is a discrepancy between beliefs and behaviors, something must change in order to eliminate or reduce the dissonance.
I think it is imperative that you listen to what these psychologists have to say as to why it’s so hard for many of us to come to grips with the reality of 9/11. Please have a listen to the video below:
Please go to the 44:45 mark:
I hope and pray that many of those left unaware will wake up to what occurred on 9/11. You will have many government agents come out of the woodwork who have sold their soul to the devil and tell you that this is nothing but a conspiracy theory. They will pull things out of their asses like there is no tomorrow. Listen to you heart…
And just remember folks: Do not feed the trolls!
Who did 9/11? Organized crime. Please listen to what Gordon Duff had to say. They are the same people behind ISIS:
If you are a truth warrior and want to take your country back and have peace for humanity, please visit our page: https://www.facebook.com/VeteransTodayTruthWarriors
When you get to VT Truth Warriors, you will also see a link to receive a free ebook by GLENN CANADY on how to spread truth 1,000 more times.
“The government story they handed us about 9-11 is total bullshit. Plain and simple.”
“To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ridiculous.”
“With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.” ~ Col. GEORGE NELSON (U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator)